A decision of major revisions means you'll need to do some heavier work. Answer: The status Decision in process after Under review means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewers comments. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. All Nature editors report to the Editor of Nature, who sets Nature's publication policies. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. Table 11 sketches the different situations the editor may encounter and the decision s/he usually makes in each of these situations. The paper is accepted for publication in principle once the authors have made some revisions in response to the referees comments. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. In cases where authors opt in to publication of peer reviewer comments and reviewers opt in to being named, we will not link a reviewers name to their report unless they choose to sign their comments to the author with their name. What the . //--> the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Sometimes they are more busy. [CDATA[// >Scott, Michael - Ancient Worlds_ A Global History of Antiquity | PDF Sorry we couldn't be helpful. Cactus Communications. The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Click to reveal To obtain I have been working in the Scientific Publishing Industry for more than 3 years now. New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. ensure that the paper is at the length specified by the manuscript editor (including number of figures). By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. At this point, you realize you've reached the end of the email, thus eliminating the possibility that some subsequent paragraph will say, "However, today is Opposite Day.". Journal Said "Major Revisions" Needed? Here's What to Do Special attention is paid by the editors to the readability of submitted material. As opposed to an editor, a peer reviewer advises the researcher of how he would have conducted his research, and what research methods would have made a difference. To borrow a phrase that Bertolt Brecht originally wrote about science itself, the chief aim of our appeals process is not to open a door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error., Decisions, decisions. Rejections based on serious errors are frustrating for authors and damaging to the journal's credibility, and so we have a procedure for reconsidering decisions at the author's request. Directly from with editor, to decision under process. No products in the cart. The Decision Started status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journals editorial board is in the process of making a decision. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? editor decision started nature rejection - playtcubed.com Overall, it is relatively uncommon for new information to completely change our view of a manuscript, and we ultimately uphold our original decisions in over 90% of cases. A group of my colleagues recently discussed scheduling about 25,000 words to 35,000 words per week for a typical edit, if there even is such a thing. Is it possible to rotate a window 90 degrees if it has the same length and width? If your article is accepted, it could take anywhere from a few months to three years for the journal to publish your piece. Manuscript Status Tables Part 2 - Notes from the JGR-Space Physics How do I align things in the following tabular environment? Calm down, and wait a few days before starting your response, then re-read the version of the paper that you actually submitted. Did this satellite streak past the Hubble Space Telescope so close that it was out of focus? We would suggest that you wait for another 2 weeks before writing to the journal for an update. However, if it has not gone through peer review, but is directly showing the status awaiting final decision, then there is a possibility that your paper might be rejected after initial screening by the editor. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Often, Editors reject the manuscript because the analytical approach is not sufficiently rigorous, explicit and argued, or because the results are barely significant or representative. [CDATA[// >Nature | Peer-Review Duration, Review Speed, Revision Process [CDATA[// >
sweden women's curling team 2022